Menu
2025 Latest TestkingPDF NCP-US-6.5 PDF Dumps and NCP-US-6.5 Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rXBwM5hy1JYWNo3I-n79wFyz_TCX4Uvy
Our NCP-US-6.5 real study guide materials can help you get better and better reviews. This is a very intuitive standard, but sometimes it is not enough comprehensive, therefore, we need to know the importance of getting the test NCP-US-6.5 certification, qualification certificate for our future job and development is an important role. Only when we have enough qualifications to prove our ability can we defeat our opponents in the harsh reality. We believe our NCP-US-6.5 actual question will help you pass the NCP-US-6.5 qualification examination and get your qualification faster and more efficiently.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
>> Reliable NCP-US-6.5 Guide Files <<
Just download the Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) PDF dumps file and start the Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) exam questions preparation right now. Whereas the other two Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) practice test software is concerned, both are the mock Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Exam Dumps and help you to provide the real-time Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 (NCP-US-6.5) exam environment for preparation.
NEW QUESTION # 65
How can an administrator deploy a new instance of Files?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Files Console view in Prism Central is the primary interface for deploying and managing Files clusters. Administrators can use the Files Console to create a new instance of Files by providing the required information, such as cluster name, network configuration, storage capacity, and license key. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide
NEW QUESTION # 66
A company is currently using Objects 3.2 with a single Object Store and a single S3 bucket that was created as a repository for their data protection (backup) application. In the near future, additional S3 buckets will be created as this was requested by their DevOps team. After facing several issues when writing backup images to the S3 bucket, the vendor of the data protection solution found the issue to be a compatibility issue with the S3 protocol. The proposed solution is to use an NFS repository instead of the S3 bucket as backup is a critical service, and this issue was unknown to the backup software vendor with no foreseeable date to solve this compatibility issue. What is the fastest solution that requires the least consumption of compute capacity (CPU and memory) of their Nutanix infrastructure?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The company is using Nutanix Objects 3.2, a component of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), which provides S3-compatible object storage. Due to an S3 protocol compatibility issue with their backup application, they need to switch to an NFS repository. The solution must be the fastest and consume the least compute capacity (CPU and memory) on their Nutanix infrastructure.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Delete the existing bucket, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access): Incorrect.
Nutanix Objects does support NFS access for buckets starting with version 3.5 (as per Nutanix documentation), but Objects 3.2 does not have this capability. Since the company is using Objects 3.2, this option is not feasible without upgrading or redeploying Objects, which is not mentioned in this option. Even if NFS were supported, deleting and recreating buckets does not address the compatibility issue directly and may still consume compute resources for bucket operations.
* Option B (Deploy Files and create a new Share with multi-protocol access enabled): Correct.
Nutanix Files, another component of NUS, supports NFS natively and can be deployed to create an NFS share quickly. Multi-protocol access (e.g., NFS and SMB) can be enabled on a Files share, allowing the backup application to use NFS as a repository. Deploying a Files instance with a minimal configuration (e.g., 3 FSVMs) consumes relatively low compute resources compared to redeploying or upgrading Objects, and it is the fastest way to provide an NFS repository without modifying the existing Objects deployment.
* Option C (Redeploy Objects using the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access): Incorrect. Redeploying Objects with the latest version (e.g., 4.0 or later) would allow NFS v3 access, as this feature was introduced in Objects 3.5. However, redeployment is a time-consuming process that involves uninstalling the existing Object Store, redeploying a new instance, and reconfiguring buckets. This also consumes significant compute resources during the redeployment process, making it neither the fastest nor the least resource-intensive solution.
* Option D (Upgrade Objects to the latest version, create a new bucket, and enable NFS v3 access):
Incorrect. Upgrading Objects from 3.2 to a version that supports NFS (e.g., 3.5 or later) is a viable solution, as it would allow enabling NFS v3 access on a new bucket. However, upgrading Objects involves downtime, validation, and potential resource overhead during the upgrade process, which does not align with the requirement for the fastest solution with minimal compute capacity usage.
Why Option B is the Fastest and Least Resource-Intensive:
* Nutanix Files Deployment: Deploying a new Nutanix Files instance is a straightforward process that can be completed in minutes via Prism Central or the Files Console. A minimal Files deployment (e.g.,
3 FSVMs) requires 4 vCPUs and 12 GiB of RAM per FSVM (as noted in Question 2), totaling 12 vCPUs and 36 GiB of RAM. This is a relatively low resource footprint compared to redeploying or upgrading an Objects instance, which may require more compute resources during the process.
* NFS Support: Nutanix Files natively supports NFS, and enabling multi-protocol access (NFS and SMB) on a share is a simple configuration step that does not require modifying the existing Objects deployment.
* Speed: Deploying Files and creating a share can be done without downtime to the existing Objects setup, making it faster than upgrading or redeploying Objects.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Deployment Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Nutanix Files supports multi-protocol access, allowing shares to be accessed via both NFS and SMB protocols. To enable NFS access, deploy a Files instance and create a share with multi-protocol access enabled. A minimal Files deployment requires 3 FSVMs, each with 4 vCPUs and 12 GiB of RAM, ensuring efficient resource usage." From the Nutanix Objects Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Starting with Objects 3.5, NFS v3 access is supported for buckets, allowing them to be mounted as NFS file systems. This feature is not available in earlier versions, such as Objects 3.2."
:
Nutanix Files Deployment Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Deploying Nutanix Files and Configuring Shares" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Objects Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "NFS Access for Buckets" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files and Objects Comparison".
NEW QUESTION # 67
A team of developers are working on a new processing application and requires a solution where they can upload the ... code for testing API calls. Older iterations should be retained as newer code is developer and tested.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Nutanix Objects supports versioning, which is a feature that allows multiple versions of an object to be preserved in the same bucket. Versioning can be useful for developers who need to upload their code for testing API calls and retain older iterations as newer code is developed and tested. Versioning can also provide protection against accidental deletion or overwrite of objects. Reference: Nutanix Objects Administration Guide
NEW QUESTION # 68
An administrator is upgrading Files from version 3.7 to 4.1 in a highly secured environment. The pre-upgrade check fails with the following error:
"FileServer preupgrade check failed with cause(s) Sub task poll timed out" What initial troubleshooting step should the administrator take?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Nutanix Files, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), requires pre-upgrade checks to ensure a successful upgrade (e.g., from version 3.7 to 4.1). The error "Sub task poll timed out" indicates that a subtask during the pre-upgrade check did not complete within the expected time, likely due to communication or resource issues among the File Server Virtual Machines (FSVMs).
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Increase upgrades timeout from ecli): Incorrect. The ecli (Entity CLI) is not a standard Nutanix command-line tool for managing upgrades, and "upgrades timeout" is not a configurable parameter in this context. While timeouts can sometimes be adjusted, this is not the initial troubleshooting step, and the error suggests a deeper issue (e.g., communication failure) rather than a timeout setting.
* Option B (Check there is enough disk space on FSVMs): Incorrect. While insufficient disk space on FSVMs can cause upgrade issues (e.g., during the upgrade process itself), the "Sub task poll timed out" error during pre-upgrade checks is more likely related to communication or task execution issues between FSVMs, not disk space. Disk space checks are typically part of the pre-upgrade validation, and a separate error would be logged if space was the issue.
* Option C (Examine the failed tasks on the FSVMs): Incorrect. Examining failed tasks on the FSVMs (e.g., by checking logs) is a valid troubleshooting step, but it is not the initial step. The "Sub task poll timed out" error suggests a communication issue, so verifying connectivity should come first. Once connectivity is confirmed, examining logs for specific task failures would be a logical next step.
* Option D (Verify connectivity between the FSVMs): Correct. The "Sub task poll timed out" error indicates that the pre-upgrade check could not complete a subtask, likely because FSVMs were unable to communicate with each other or with the cluster. Nutanix Files upgrades require FSVMs to coordinate tasks, and this coordination depends on network connectivity (e.g., over the Storage and Client networks). Verifying connectivity between FSVMs (e.g., checking network status, VLAN configuration, or firewall rules in a highly secured environment) is the initial troubleshooting step to identify and resolve the root cause of the timeout.
Why Option D?
In a highly secured environment, network restrictions (e.g., firewalls, VLAN misconfigurations) are common causes of communication issues between FSVMs. The "Sub task poll timed out" error suggests that the pre- upgrade check failed because a task could not complete, likely due to FSVMs being unable to communicate.
Verifying connectivity between FSVMs is the first step to diagnose and resolve this issue, ensuring that subsequent pre-upgrade checks can proceed.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"If the pre-upgrade check fails with a 'Sub task poll timed out' error, this typically indicates a communication issue between FSVMs. As an initial troubleshooting step, verify connectivity between the FSVMs, ensuring that the Storage and Client networks are properly configured and that there are no network restrictions (e.g., firewalls) preventing communication."
:
Nutanix Files Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Troubleshooting Files Upgrades" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files Upgrade Troubleshooting".
NEW QUESTION # 69
Which metric is utilized when sizing a Files deployment based on performance requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
This metric indicates the number of active clients that are accessing the Files cluster via SMB protocol, which affects the performance of the Files cluster. NFS concurrent connections is also a relevant metric, but it is not the best answer, as it only applies to NFS protocol, not SMB. The quantity of SMB shares or NFS exports does not directly affect the performance of the Files cluster, as they are logical entities that do not consume resources. References: Nutanix Files Sizing Guide
NEW QUESTION # 70
......
Our website has focused on the study of NCP-US-6.5 vce braindumps for many years and created latest NCP-US-6.5 dumps pdf for all level of candiates. All questions and answers are tested and approved by our IT professionals who are specialized in the NCP-US-6.5 Pass Guide. You can completely trust the accuracy of our NCP-US-6.5 exam questions because we will full refund if you failed exam with our training materials.
NCP-US-6.5 Valid Exam Camp: https://www.testkingpdf.com/NCP-US-6.5-testking-pdf-torrent.html
P.S. Free & New NCP-US-6.5 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by TestkingPDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rXBwM5hy1JYWNo3I-n79wFyz_TCX4Uvy
